I have seen several discussion boards on the topic of beauty. And the general theme of these boards is that, if you think you are beautiful then you are beautiful. If you are confident and act beautiful then you become beautiful. You hear this mantra expressed by people repeatedly over and over again.
But is this really true? No. It feels nice to believe that you are beautiful if you treat yourself as a beautiful person. But in actuality it is a lie. There is no consciously created beauty as many people believe. Beauty is what other people perceive of you, not what you perceive of yourself.
I have a tiny penis. My penis is 5 inches long when erect, pretty small, quite asian. If I think of myself as having a giant penis it is not going to happen. Because "giant" is what other people consider giant, not what I consider giant. "Giant", from my internet experience, is usually 8 inches. Guys like to brag online how giant their cocks are. I wonder how true it is, I doubt it, but an 8 inch cock sounds pretty large. If people think of a "giant" cock as 8 inches then that is the defining property of a giant cock. Under this definition my penis is extraordinary small. If I look into a mirror and tell myself "I have a giant penis" that would not make it giant under the consensus of the masses. My attitude towards my penis would not change the public's perception of my penis.
Beauty is the same thing. What is beautiful is to a large degree based on social consensus (and partly evolutionary). During the Victorian age it was considered to be beautiful to have very pale skin. Today it is considered ugly, to look beautiful today people need to have tanned skin. There were civilizations that respected fat people, because being fat was the sign of wealth and success. In the US and in European countries being fat is considered to be repulsive, especially in the US. The US today glorifies nearly anorexic women on TV, because the message is that thin is beautiful. To be "beautiful" therefore means to be in the norm of what the public consensus is. If in the US to be beautiful means to be well-built, shaved, tanned, and tall then that is what qualifies as beautiful. It does not matter what you think of yourself. All of that is irrelevant. If you are a disgusting piece of meat then that is what other people would think of you.
What I really hate about the topic of beauty is this deception that the beautiful give to the ugly. It is deception, and nothing more. Its goal is to make the ugly people feel good about themselves but in all actuality it is deception. When the beautiful tell the ugly, "you are beautiful on the inside", that is just a statement to make them feel happier about themselves. I agree that internal beauty is more important than external beauty. However, it is deception nonetheless, because the message of such a statement is to say that they are beautiful, which they are not.
It is also very strange when beautiful people tell ugly people, "you just need to be positive about how you look". Easy for you to say, because, ... you are beautiful! You see this on the Tyra Banks show. Tyra is gorgeous and the girls she sometimes has on her program are ugly or fat or just not happy about their looks. And her general message, to summarize, is to be positive about how you look. Beautiful people are not supposed to be lecturing ugly people on how to feel good about themselves. It makes no sense. It is like having a super fat trainer teach you about how to lose weight.
Here is the true. It is the sad truth but it needs to be said. There is no such thing as "internal beauty" (well there is, it just does not express itself to your physical beauty). All of that is just an excuse for you to feel good about yourself. The way the world works is very simple. The hot looking people date hot looking people. And the ugly looking people date the ugly looking people because they have no one else to date (unless they happen to be rich and buy themselves a hot date). If you are fat and repulsive there is not much you can do. You are destined to basically date ugly people. You cannot aspire to "higher levels" (I put it into quotations because for me beauty is so superficial that it is not really a higher level on any rational level) in your repulsive body.
There are three things you can do about your repulsion. First, you can continue to deceive yourself that beauty is what you make it and continue living a lie. Second, you can accept the truth and then work to become beautiful or if you cannot then you can cry about how ugly you are.
Third, and this is what I do, you can raise your middle finger, point it to the beautiful people and tell them, "I do not care how I look. I may be ugly, but I am free". You can recognize that most of beauty is just a social fabrication that changes from time to time, a deception over the eyes of the people. It is unphilosophical and against reason to care for how someone looks rather than who someone actually is. And with that you can recognize the advantages of being ugly (here). You will be happy in this way, you will finally be at ease.
Sunday, October 17, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Five inches isn't tiny. It's perfectly normal. You should know better than to judge yourself by the standards of porn or the exaggerations of anonymous internet posters.
ReplyDelete"Five inches isn't tiny.":
ReplyDeleteWould you suck a 5 inch cock? ^^
I'll bet "Avi" is really Tyra...
ReplyDeleteYou are somewhat right but you forgot one thing. People that are positive and exhude a happy and postive energy look a little bit (maybe even significantly) more physically attractive than the same person with a negative energy. So being always in a positive frame of mind about your life and yourself and toward other people actually makes you look a little bit physically better and makes others more attracted to you.
ReplyDeleteIf I was sexually attracted to the person, and that's what they desired, of course! Why wouldn't I? The size of the other person's member has no bearing on my ability to give them pleasure.
ReplyDeleteI'd also add to Joseph's point, and say that I don't think confidence makes someone look better physically, but the confidence itself is attractive. People are attracted to one another for a whole host of reasons, and anyone who thinks it's based purely on physical characteristics is woefully naive. Seeing strong self-confidence in a person is a major turn-on for many people.
Who's Tyra?
"If I was sexually attracted to the person, and that's what they desired, of course! Why wouldn't I? The size of the other person's member has no bearing on my ability to give them pleasure.":
ReplyDeleteMember, haha. Say "penis".
"People are attracted to one another for a whole host of reasons, and anyone who thinks it's based purely on physical characteristics is woefully naive.":
Physical appearance is the necessary component to any relationship, but it is not sufficient.
"Who's Tyra?":
Tyra Banks, she is a model and runs a TV show (really made for girls, way too girly) called "Tyra Banks Show".
I knew it! You seriously have to get over your ugliness illusion.
ReplyDeleteThe way you went on and on about your tiny penis i figured you had maybe one or two inches there. but you've got a good 5 which is within normal range.
Which convinces me that your general looks aren't nearly as obnoxious as you imagine either.
I wonder what came first, your conviction of your undesirability and your undesireable social behavior or vice versa.
Kisarita, this post is not about me. It has nothing to do with me. It was about beauty and how deceptive the notion is.
ReplyDeletePenis. Penis. Penis.
ReplyDeleteI know who Tyra Banks is. (Penis.) Just thought there must be some other Tyra hanging around here (penis), otherwise why would I be accused of being Tyra?
Penis. Penis. Penis.
Happy?
I think I said 'member' simply because I really wanted to connote "other persons sexual organs", rather than just the primary male sexual organ. The person receiving the pleasuring feels just as good irrespective of the size of their breast, penis, nipple, clitoris, or other sexually stimulated area.
Penis.
> Physical appearance is the necessary component to any relationship, but it is not sufficient.
ReplyDeleteI don't agree. Attraction is the necessary component. For many people (especially males) physical appearance is a large component of that, but for many other people, personality, wit, intellect, ambition, power, wealth, prestige, sensuality, kindness, and other characteristics can make an otherwise unattractive person seem very desirable.
"Happy?":
ReplyDeleteYes I am happy. You sound very sexy.
"I don't agree. Attraction is the necessary component. For many people (especially males) physical appearance is a large component of that, but for many other people, personality, wit, intellect, ambition, power, wealth, prestige, sensuality, kindness, and other characteristics can make an otherwise unattractive person seem very desirable.":
Attraction is a necessary (unless this is Platonic relationship) component. And I will show you why this is so. Suppose you are a male and you straight. But then you do care about appearance! Because you only date girls, and girls are girls not of what their mind is, but what their appearance is. A straight guy will only date girls. It does not matter to him how awesome another guy is. He is just not going for that. Therefore, it is based on physical apparance.
I'm not sure if you're arguing with me or agreeing, but either way, I see no point in debating this. It doesn't really matter to me how you view the issue of attraction.
ReplyDeletePenis.
"I'm not sure if you're arguing with me or agreeing, but either way, I see no point in debating this. It doesn't really matter to me how you view the issue of attraction.":
ReplyDeleteDo you agree that if a straight guy only dates women then it means that the physical is a necessary component? Being a women is a physical trait. So if he only goes after women then it means that the primary feature for his relationship is physical. Everything else: confidence, personality, and so forth is secondary.
I think that a lot of people are uncomfortable with the idea that relationships (exceot Platonic ones) are necessarily build on the physical, so they need other excuses. But this is the truth to relationships, in fact it must be so for evolutionary reasons. The science and the philosophy supports my position.
Not at about you my penis. This is a sour grapes rant if i ever saw one. And most probably entirely unnecessary.
ReplyDeleteKisarita why you so obsessed about my penis?
ReplyDelete